http://www.ccjdigital.com/masco-names-southeastern-carrier-of-the-year/ Business solutions for professionals who run trucking companies and maintain equipment. Thu, 09 Feb 2012 00:16:25 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4 http://www.ccjdigital.com/masco-names-southeastern-carrier-of-the-year/comment-page-1/#comment-480 Fred Ruggiero Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:27:15 +0000 http://www.ccjdigital.com/?p=20685#comment-480 I would hope that the EPA is using some of the millions of dollars in fines it has received from the transportation industry / manufactures. I am thrilled to see that Ms. Goldsmith recognizes the burden that has been put on the owner operators by the EPA and Feds. Now that on / off road vehicle and equipment, autos, the marine and lawn garden industries have reduced emission in the 70% to 180% range since 1995. My question is , WHEN WILL STATIONARY EMMITTERS BE FORCED TO CONTRIBUTE TO THE EMISSION REDUCTION IN OUR COUNTRY? Stationary emitters are still permitted to burn the same high sulphur fuel (.7 - 1. sulphur), (ULSD diesel is 15ppm), stationary emitters are still not forced to use SCR (it will be on mobile vehicles 2010) BTW(SCR was 1st developed for stationary applications) Balancing the burden will produce greater overall emmisions reduction in the U S, due to the diminishing returns from further regulation in the mobile sector. I would hope that the EPA is using some of the millions of dollars
in fines it has received from the transportation industry / manufactures.
I am thrilled to see that Ms. Goldsmith recognizes the burden that has been put on the owner operators by the EPA and Feds.
Now that on / off road vehicle and equipment, autos, the marine and lawn garden industries have reduced emission in the 70% to 180% range since 1995.
My question is , WHEN WILL STATIONARY EMMITTERS BE FORCED TO CONTRIBUTE TO THE EMISSION REDUCTION IN OUR COUNTRY?
Stationary emitters are still permitted to burn the same high sulphur fuel (.7 – 1. sulphur), (ULSD diesel is 15ppm), stationary emitters are still not forced to use SCR (it will be on mobile vehicles 2010)
BTW(SCR was 1st developed for stationary applications)
Balancing the burden will produce greater overall emmisions reduction in the U S, due to the diminishing returns from further regulation in the mobile sector.

]]> http://www.ccjdigital.com/masco-names-southeastern-carrier-of-the-year/comment-page-1/#comment-473 Rod Russellq Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:52:40 +0000 http://www.ccjdigital.com/?p=20685#comment-473 Where does the money come from to pay for this? Let me guess, tax dollars that we just continually hand down to generations to come. If an owner operator or a company cannot be competetive enough and save some money on their own, why should every one else subsidize their lack of forethought? Where does the money come from to pay for this? Let me guess, tax dollars that we just continually hand down to generations to come. If an owner operator or a company cannot be competetive enough and save some money on their own, why should every one else subsidize their lack of forethought?

]]>