White House reviews HOS documents plan

Published November 30, 2010
Print This Post 3

The Department of Transportation has sent to the White House Office of Management and Budget a proposed rule that would establish regulations governing supporting documents needed to verify drivers’ records of duty status, or logs.

The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration has said it will consider reducing or eliminating current paperwork burdens associated with supporting documents in favor of expanded use of electronic onboard recorders. The notice of proposed rulemaking also may propose an expanded mandate for EOBRs as the agency orginally planned.

In September, a federal appeals court ordered FMCSA to issue by Dec. 30 an NPRM regarding hours-of-service supporting documents as mandated by the Hazardous Materials Transportation Authorization Act of 1994. In January, the American Trucking Associations sued to force the agency to proceed with a rulemaking some 15 years after Congress ordered it to do so.

ATA and FMCSA discussed a settlement for several months, but eventually those talks broke down. In July, FMCSA issued regulatory guidance that loosened some of the supporting documents requirements imposed on motor carriers — especially those that used qualifying tracking systems that FMCSA said made a number of documents unnecessary. ATA responded, however, that a revised policy did not satisfy the congressional mandate.

FMCSA has said for more than a year that it planned to combine a regulation on supporting documents with a proposal to mandate EOBRs on certain types of operations, such as new entrants, passenger carriers and operations hauling hazardous materials. Earlier this year, FMCSA finalized a rule that will mandate, effective in June 2012, EOBRs on carriers with repeated violations. Because the White House has at most 30 days in which to review an NPRM on supporting documents, it isn’t clear whether the scope of this NPRM includes expansion of the EOBR mandate or whether that issue will be considered later.

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

If u know how to run your log book u wouldnt hav those problems bsing over hos mr. luis pereia

You sir, are as stupid as the oppressive politicians and their nazi enforcers. If you actually had a cdl, which you don't. You would know it is only possible to a point to find adequate parking within the 14 hour rule. I have 18 times on my logbook used the "forced by shipper or receiver to leave premises" on my logbook in the last 11 months. Following that up with " nearest safe haven " when I finally found somewhere to park. People like you are not helping anyway by spewing lies about or weak rebuttal's to a drivers concerns. The term " Plan accordingly" is a cop out for ignorant and naive people like yourself, who are unwilling to help find a solution.

FMCSA. should.start Regulating Brokers.They are the ones that besides under paying truckers threat truckers to be penalized with a deduction of Up to $500 if the load do not get to destination on time.this is one Reason everybody runs over their daily logbook hours.80% of drivers are always on logbook violation due to lack of truck parking truck stops are always full. NO city that I know of permits truck paring even on industrial /Commercial zones.if you park on a on or off highway Ramp.you get a parking ticket.it tuns in to a moving violation. the Cop wakes you up and make you sign it.We need Smart People AT FMCSA.that takes this in consideration.BEFORE.MORE REGULATIONS AGAINST TRUCKERS...

Advertisement
Advertisement