Distraction guidelines proposed for automakers

Published February 16, 2012
Print This Post 2

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration on Thursday, Feb. 16, announced the first-ever federally proposed guidelines to encourage automobile manufacturers to limit the distraction risk for in-vehicle electronic devices. The proposed voluntary guidelines would apply to communications, entertainment, information gathering and navigation devices or functions that are not required to safely operate the vehicle.

The guidelines would establish specific recommended criteria for electronic devices installed in vehicles at the time they are manufactured that require visual or manual operation by drivers. The announcement of the guidelines comes just days after President Obama’s FY 2013 budget request, which includes $330 million over six years for distracted driving programs that increase awareness of the issue and encourage stakeholders to take action.

“Distracted driving is a dangerous and deadly habit on America’s roadways,” said U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood. “These guidelines are a major step forward in identifying real solutions to tackle the issue of distracted driving for drivers of all ages.”

Geared toward light vehicles – cars, SUVs, pickup trucks, minivans and other vehicles rated at not more than 10,000 pounds gross vehicle weight – the guidelines are the first in a series of guidance documents NHTSA plans to issue to address sources of distraction that require use of the hands and/or diversion of the eyes from the primary task of driving.

In particular, the Phase I proposed guidelines recommend criteria that manufacturers can use to ensure the systems or devices they provide in their vehicles are less likely to distract the driver with tasks not directly relevant to safely operating the vehicle, or cause undue distraction by engaging the driver’s eyes or hands for more than a limited duration while driving. Electronic warning system functions such as forward-collision or lane departure alerts would not be subject to the proposed guidelines, since they are intended to warn a driver of a potential crash and are not considered distracting devices.

“We recognize that vehicle manufacturers want to build vehicles that include the tools and conveniences expected by today’s American drivers,” said NHTSA Administrator David Strickland. “The guidelines we’re proposing would offer real-world guidance to automakers to help them develop electronic devices that provide features consumers want—without disrupting a driver’s attention or sacrificing safety.”

The proposed Phase I distraction guidelines include recommendations to:
 Reduce complexity and task length required by the device;
 Limit device operation to one hand only;
 Limit individual off-road glances required for device operation to no more than two seconds in duration;
 Limit unnecessary visual information in the driver’s field of view; and
 Limit the amount of manual inputs required for device operation.

The proposed guidelines also would recommend the disabling of the following operations by in-vehicle electronic devices while driving, unless the devices are intended for use by passengers and cannot reasonably be accessed or seen by the driver, or unless the vehicle is stopped and the transmission shift lever is in park.
 Visual-manual text messaging;
 Visual-manual Internet browsing;
 Visual-manual social media browsing;
 Visual-manual navigation system destination entry by address;
 Visual-manual 10-digit phone dialing; and
 Displaying to the driver more than 30 characters of text unrelated to the driving task.

NHTSA also is considering future, Phase II proposed guidelines that might address devices or systems that are not built into the vehicle but are brought into the vehicle and used while driving, including aftermarket and portable personal electronic devices such as navigation systems, smartphones, electronic tablets and pads, and other mobile communications devices. A third set of proposed guidelines (Phase III) may address voice-activated controls to further minimize distraction in factory-installed, aftermarket and portable devices.

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

The best safety device in a car or truck is the driver.

Educate the driver by requiring a drivers education course in their teens prior to obtaining a license. When renewing the license have them watch a video to learn of changes and legal decisions that have taken place.
Teach them what the yield sign means on the merging ramp.

Teach them real meaning of the word STOP on the red octagon sign.
Make them take responsibly for their actions. zero coddling allowed.
It matters not how long it takes to do something , one changes their mind and can do it again and again.
All the dangerous distractions are not in the vehicle but out side of it. Construction equipment, accidents on the shoulder, hot air balloons,bikinis, Anything can be a distraction. It is one thing to improve braking , stabilization and visibility.
Some drivers as we all know should never be allowed to drive at all.
I wonder if this distraction mumbo jumbo is going to fall in place along side the crash test dummy now?
Sorry but the stereo did not survive the side crash test, however the GPS, Ipod and the thumb drive survived with minor scratches.

government intervention is getting old now.

Good grief.
When is the government going to quit poking it's nose into our business?
Millions of safe drivers have all kinds of electronic devices in their vehicles. It is the unsafe driver that has the accidents. Punish them after the fact . Not assume that we all are going to be involved in or cause an accident due to the stereo or gps or the button that takes the top down on our convertible. Enough is enough. I guess every Ralph Nader wanna be in Washington wants a shot at their 15 minutes of fame.
Do these over paid do nothings in Washington have so little to do and so much time on their hands that they feel the need to screw up the country?
Looking at the real problem is law enforcement officers with far too many distractions in their vehicles. Lap tops blocking part of the view out the windshield. They always have to turn their heads away from immediate traffic to see it. Always taking their eyes off the road to read the screen while driving. Personal communication devices like a cell phone. More than one radio to use .Attention always on the radio listening for that one certain call .
NO training is available to make them safer while being distracted while driving.The same for the average motorist. Many truckers are more qualified to have radios and gps and other electronic device's in the vehicle than 99.9% of the law enforcement officers are.
Have you ever heard of a school to teach officers or anyone for that matter to be safer while being unsafe while in a pursuit or just cruising with their attention on something else?
Me neither.
This crap is nothing more than the Government gaining more control over us.We are turning into a country of sheeple.

Advertisement
Advertisement