Ferro: Safety Fitness Determination, entry-level driver training rules coming

Published May 22, 2012
Print This Post

Updating CCJ Spring Symposium attendees on the latest Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration rulemakings, FMCSA Administrator Anne Ferro on Tuesday, May 22, said the industry can be on the lookout for a Safety Fitness Determination proposal and perhaps a rulemaking in 2013, as well as possibly a long-awaited entry-level driver training rule.

The Safety Measurement System – which Ferro described as one of “the three core components” of FMCSA’s Compliance, Safety, Accountability program – replaced SafeStat to determine which fleets should be eyeballed for roadside inspections and to provide fleets with better visibility. Under the Safety Fitness Determination, FMCSA could use that data to replace the onsite inspection process.

Ferro said feedback regarding the CSA preview now available to fleets is critical. “That preview is under way because we want your input,” she told Symposium attendees. “Some in the industry are very concerned, and we need to know what those concerns are so that we can address them.”

Ferro estimated a current population of about 500,000 freight carriers and said that about 490,000 of those have no fatality numbers. “We have 200,000 carriers with sufficient data to analyze for all carriers, and 92 percent of all crashes are attributed to those carriers,” she said. “They represent 80 percent of the power units. Crash history is one of the stronger predictors of future crashes. How are we going to address crash accountability when it comes to addressing the (Behavior Analysis Safety Improvement Categories)?”

Ferro said the agency calls this process “crash weighting” – preventable vs. nonpreventable. “We started to answer that question through police reports, but those vary from state to state,” she said. “Over the course of the 90-day filing period, the content may change. So our challenge is if we have the final final report?”

Another element of CSA is how to make it a fair and open system, Ferro said. “If a company has a comment, how do we address that and other parties in the report, and if that process improves safety?” she said.

To make the system more fair for flatbed carriers, FMCSA recently moved Load Securement from the Cargo-Related BASIC to Vehicle Maintenance. “There was some concern that we were diluting the Load Securement category, but our accuracy went up 40 percent,” Ferro said.

Ferro also discussed where the electronic onboard recorder rulemaking process now stands in light of the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association’s successful court challenge that FMCSA failed to address how fleets would be prevented from using the devices to harass drivers.

“We’ve worked closely with EOBR partners – vendors, carriers and law enforcement – on the technical standards,” she said. “We’ve also worked with drivers to learn more about the harassment issue.” FMCSA also must address the issue of hours-of-service supporting documents for EOBRs , she said.

All of those components will be addressed in a forthcoming Supplemental Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on EOBRs, due late this year or early 2013. “It will be a proposal, and we’ll need your feedback,” Ferro said.

Ferro also reminded Symposium attendees of the July 2013 effective date of FMCSA’s final hours-of-service rule, but chose not to address pending legal action targeting the rule and instead emphasized its definitive status in the agency’s eyes. “The whole intent was to target cumulative fatigue,” she said of the new 34-hour restart provision.

View this article on one page
Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
Gordon A 11 pts

Why is it that those that know nothing about trucking are trying to tell us how to do it?  Ferro and La Hood know absolutely nothing about how the trucking industry works and listen to others like them.    I probably  have been driving a truck longer than Ms Ferro has been out of diapers. 

I know of some CEO's of trucking companies that know nothing about trucking. They just  were owed a favor or have a degree in economics. or simply belong to the good ol boys club.

Speed limiters will not make our highways safer.    EOBR's will not make our highways safer. CSA2010 will not make our highways safer. 

Reducing the  number of unsafe drivers  will make our highways much safer.    It has been proven that the car drivers are the cause of the majority of car truck accidents.85% to 87%. That is the problem that needs to be fixed.

Teach the potential automobile driver at the age of high school and they will be safer drivers when they reach adult hood. Education is the answer not more useless regulations and  idiotic fines and a point system targeting the safe truckers. .

The CSA 2010 is not making our highways safer but more unsafe. It is driving the professionals out of trucking and allowing the less than professional driver to fill the seats. No fixes in that system. Just new unqualified steering wheel holders. Our government , Ferro, La Hood  and the ATA  are manufacturing a driver shortage so they can point to it then without lying and tell us that we HAVE to allow  NON US drivers in to fill the shortage.

Improve the driver training schools and require more stringent credentials and a higher passing grade to get the CDL. . The New drivers need to understand the term consideration. With understanding and using  it  they are going to improve the industry  a little each driver.  

Without driver consideration the industry is doomed to needless regulations imposed by the unknowing, uncaring power hungry suits in DC..

Being considerate  among other things means parking between the lines not on them.

It means  pulling forward after fueling .

It means acting like the professional they want to be called.

It means not driving the truck like  they do their car.

It means thinking before they speak so the foul language is reduced  in public.

It means dressing like a pro instead of like a street  dweller.

Since so many drivers do not follow simple courtesy guidelines we have the CSA 2010, the attitude of us against them by the LEO,s .needless regulations and the unneeded constantly changing  HOS that seems to not find a permanent setting.

 

 

Advertisement
Advertisement