The growing challenge of shared risk in ELDs and Chameleon ELDs

Joe Ohr 2024 Headshot Headshot

Electronic Logging Devices (ELDs) have become a cornerstone of commercial motor vehicle safety and regulatory compliance since the federal ELD mandate took effect in 2017.

Designed to automatically record drivers' hours of service (HOS) and reduce opportunities for logbook falsification, ELDs play a critical role in ensuring that drivers comply with federal regulations intended to combat fatigue-related crashes. However, recent actions by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) and ongoing research by the National Motor Freight Traffic Association (NMFTA) suggest that significant concerns remain regarding the quality, security, and compliance of many devices currently operating throughout the industry.

Since the beginning of 2025, the industry has seen a significant increase in the number of ELDs revoked from the FMCSA's registered device list due to concerns about safety, reliability, and regulatory compliance. While these revocations demonstrate a willingness by regulators to take action against problematic devices, they may represent only a fraction of a much larger issue.

Research conducted by the NMFTA indicates that many ELDs marketed under different company names may share substantial portions of their underlying technology, creating the potential for widespread and interconnected risks across the marketplace. Much like the industry's well-known "chameleon carriers," these devices operate as chameleon ELDs.

The NMFTA's ongoing research project seeks to identify and better understand shared risk among ELD manufacturers and service providers. Rather than focusing solely on individual devices, the team is examining the broader ELD ecosystem, including hardware components, firmware, mobile applications, country of origin and support organizations. This comprehensive approach is intended to uncover vulnerabilities and compliance concerns that may affect multiple devices simultaneously, even when those devices appear to be offered by competing companies.

Partner Insights
Information to advance your business from industry suppliers

One of the most significant findings to emerge from this research is the prevalence of white-labeled and shared technology across the ELD marketplace. White-labeling occurs when a single manufacturer or software developer provides the same core technology to multiple vendors, who then market the product under different brand names. Although these products may appear distinct to carriers and drivers, they often share the same underlying hardware, software or application code.

Through reverse-engineering efforts, firmware analysis, open-source intelligence (OSINT) research and mobile application investigations, the NMFTA has discovered that many ELDs on the FMCSA registry share common Android application packages, hardware platforms and software libraries. While branding may differ, the underlying technology remains substantially the same.

This finding has significant implications for both compliance and cybersecurity. If a single ELD is found to be noncompliant and subsequently removed from the FMCSA's registered list, there is no guarantee that other devices sharing the same underlying technology will be identified or removed. As a result, the same compliance deficiencies or security vulnerabilities may continue to exist throughout an entire family of related devices.

Researchers have compared this phenomenon to the concept of chameleon carriers, a term commonly used within the trucking industry to describe carriers that attempt to evade enforcement actions by operating under new business identities. Similarly, white-labeled ELD families can create the appearance of a diverse and competitive marketplace while relying on largely identical technology platforms. If one device is revoked, another nearly identical device may continue operating under a different name, leaving the root issue unresolved.

The scale of this issue appears to be substantial. The NMFTA has analyzed hundreds of Android-based ELD applications and identified more than a dozen distinct families of white-labeled offerings. Some of these families contain dozens of devices, while at least one identified group includes more than 100 related products all marketed under different names. Additionally, research into physical hardware has revealed that many devices rely on a relatively small number of common hardware manufacturers and platforms.

Beyond compliance concerns, cybersecurity risks represent another major area of focus. ELDs are not standalone devices; they operate within a complex ecosystem involving wireless communications, mobile applications, cloud services and vehicle networks. Data is frequently transmitted through Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, cellular networks, smartphones, tablets and web-based management portals. Each of these connections introduces potential attack surfaces that could be exploited by malicious actors.

Despite the critical role ELDs play in commercial transportation, cybersecurity requirements for ELD certification remain limited. Manufacturers generally self-certify compliance with FMCSA regulations, and there is currently no comprehensive cybersecurity evaluation process required before devices are added to the registered list. This leaves fleets and drivers with limited visibility into the security posture of the devices they deploy.

The NMFTA's research has identified concerns ranging from software vulnerabilities and outdated components to broader supply chain risks. Understanding where devices are manufactured, where software is developed and where customer support operations are located has become an increasingly important aspect of evaluating overall risk. Supply chain transparency is particularly relevant as geopolitical tensions and national security concerns continue to influence discussions surrounding technology procurement and critical infrastructure protection. In addition, insecure ELDs allow for cheating by both the driver and the back office—and, as recently demonstrated, even by the ELD manufacturer itself.

These concerns are not merely theoretical. In recent years, multiple categories of technology products, including network equipment, surveillance cameras, telecommunications hardware and drones, have faced increased scrutiny due to national security considerations. Some products have even been added to federal restricted or covered entity lists. Given the critical role commercial transportation plays in supporting the nation's economy and supply chain, many industry stakeholders believe ELDs warrant a similar level of examination.

The safety implications are equally significant. Electronic logging devices are intended to help prevent excessive driving hours and reduce fatigue-related incidents. However, if noncompliant devices enable log manipulation, falsification or unauthorized editing of records, they can undermine the very purpose of the ELD mandate. Industry enforcement efforts have increasingly focused on identifying ELD tampering and manipulation, reflecting growing concern about the potential impact of unreliable devices on highway safety. This trend was evident during a recent Roadcheck enforcement campaign, where some states placed hundreds of drivers out of service.

Addressing these challenges will require collaboration among regulators, industry associations, technology providers, fleets and independent researchers. The FMCSA's recent enforcement actions represent an important step, but broader efforts may be necessary to identify systemic risks that extend beyond individual products. Enhanced oversight, improved transparency, stronger cybersecurity standards and greater scrutiny of shared technology platforms could all play a role in strengthening the integrity of the ELD ecosystem.

The NMFTA has already shared aspects of its findings with federal regulators, continues to expand its research and is encouraged by the industry's willingness to listen. As additional devices, applications and infrastructure components are analyzed, the industry will gain a clearer understanding of the true scope of shared risk across the ELD marketplace. The association plans to present further conclusions and recommendations as its research progresses.

Ultimately, the goal is not simply to identify problematic devices, but to improve the overall safety, security and reliability of technologies that commercial drivers depend on every day. As the trucking industry becomes increasingly connected and data-driven, ensuring the trustworthiness of foundational technologies such as ELDs will remain essential to protecting drivers, fleets, freight and the broader transportation network. Even as drivers have transitioned from paper logs to ELDs, some of the core techniques used to illicitly extend a driver's hours remain the same.

The NMFTA will present the conclusion of the ELD research at its Cybersecurity Conference this fall in Long Beach, Calif. To learn more, visit www.nmftacyber.com.

Joe Ohr is Chief Operating Officer for the National Motor Freight Traffic Association (NMFTA). Ohr brings has more than 20 years experience in engineering product software, gained from roles at Omnitracs, Qualcomm, and Eaton.