Please disable your Ad Blocker in your browser's extentions.

Bill to delay ELD mandate likely a non-starter in Congress

ELD being used in a truck

More than 21 members of the U.S. House have signed on as co-sponsors to the bill that would delay the compliance date of the looming electronic logging device mandate. The bill, if enacted, would give drivers and carriers two extra years to adopt ELDs by pushing the compliance deadline to December 2019.

The legislation, however, has major hurdles to clear before becoming law. With larger issues — healthcare reform, tax reform, raising the debt ceiling and 2018 appropriations, to name a few — sucking up Congressional time and energy in Washington, the bill is likely ill-fated as standalone legislation. The best bet for its passage would be to hitch a ride on a larger bill, such as the 2018 Department of Transportation appropriations bills currently in the works in Congress.

However, lawmakers appear reluctant so far to work an ELD delay into the DOT funding bills. A House committee this month stamped approval on a bill that included a one-year ELD compliance delay for livestock haulers and issued a corresponding report advising the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration to examine whether a delay is needed. The bill doesn’t require FMCSA to perform such a study, though.

Legislation introduced in House to delay ELD mandate two years

A bill has been filed in the U.S. House to delay the compliance date of the federal government’s electronic logging device two years, to December ...

Also, according to a source from the Senate Appropriations Committee, the Senate version of the bill includes no language related to ELDs. CCJ will review a copy of the bill once it’s released to verify.

The American Trucking Associations is adamant the bill does not have the necessary support in Congress to be enacted, despite the 21 co-sponsors who’ve signed on to the ELD delay bill introduced last week by Rep. Brian Babin (R-Texas).

Lawmakers have “on a bipartisan basis for several years insisted that this requirement be enacted and implemented,” says ATA’s Bill Sullivan. “Further, the fact that the committee with jurisdiction over transportation policy has shown no indication it intends to act on a broader delay shows just how little appetite there is in Congress for this. Congress has spoken, FMCSA has spoken and the courts have spoken and it is time to move forward to implement this important rule.”

The Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association, who’s engaged in a grassroots effort in recent months to rally Congress to delay or strike down the mandate, particularly for small carriers like owner-operators, is rallying truckers and those opposed to the ELD mandate to call their representatives in Washington and express support for the bill.

ELDs in cyberspace: evaluating the risks to data security, privacy

With millions of ELD devices about to go online, could they become a gateway for hackers to access sensitive vehicle controls and private data?


There are 17 comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

James Jaillet is the News Editor for CCJ and Overdrive. Reach him at