Arkansas Best posts $88.7M 4Q net loss

user-gravatar Headshot

ABF_Truck1Arkansas Best Corp. today, Jan. 28, announced a fourth-quarter 2009 net loss of $88.7 million, including previously disclosed charges for noncash goodwill impairment and supplemental pension settlements. Excluding these charges, Arkansas Best had a fourth-quarter 2009 net loss of $22.1 million compared to a net loss of $11.0 million in the fourth quarter of 2008.

“Arkansas Best’s fourth-quarter results illustrate the impact of an extremely weak and uncertain freight environment that has continued now for 40 months,” said Judy R. McReynolds, president and chief executive officer of the Fort Smith, Ark.-based company. “This economic recession has been unprecedented in its length and depth. Its impact on the LTL industry has accelerated the level of price competition throughout 2009, and the fourth quarter was no exception.”

For the fourth quarter, Arkansas Best reported revenue of $371.6 million, a per-day decrease of 5.8 percent from $391.2 million. For the full year, the company reported revenue of $1.47 billion, a per-day decrease of 19.3 percent from $1.83 billion.

“Although the economy has presented us with extreme challenges, the strength of our balance sheet and the depth and experience of the ABF team have allowed us to continue our focus on enhancing our services to customers,” McReynolds said. “A high standard of dependability, superior cargo care and adaptability to customer-specific requirements are the important elements of that focus.”

ABF Freight System had fourth-quarter revenue of $347.7 million compared to $375.2 million, a per-day decrease of 8.1 percent; and an operating loss of $32.4 million, excluding goodwill impairment and pension settlement charges, compared to an operating loss of $15.2 million. Tonnage per day decreased 1.6 percent.

For the full year, ABF Freight had revenue of $1.38 billion compared to $1.76 billion, a per-day decrease of 21.0 percent; and an operating loss of $99.9 million, excluding goodwill impairment and pension settlement charges, compared to operating income of $49.1 million. Tonnage per day decreased 11.4 percent.

Partner Insights
Information to advance your business from industry suppliers

“Our 2010 operating performance will continue to be challenged until some positive change occurs, such as a better freight economy, improved pricing or some other industry catalyst,” McReynolds said. “In the meantime, our company has responded to this environment by reducing headcount, equipment levels and costs in a number of areas in relation to available business levels. Our employees are doing more with less while maintaining a superior level of productivity and equipment utilization.”

McReynolds said that in addition to the company’s regular, daily management of personnel and assets, it recently addressed its cost structure further. “Because of actions we have taken, improvements in the financial markets and other events, we anticipate lower 2010 expenses in several areas of nonunion fringe benefit costs.” These items include:

  • Suspension of the 401(k) company match;
  • Lower costs associated with pension and postretirement plans;
  • Structural changes to company health care plans; and
  • Change to certain executive benefit plans to further align our executive compensation with the performance of the company.

 “We anticipate that the annual savings associated with these changes will be in a range of $15 to $18 million on a pretax basis,” McReynolds said. “Our financial strength and stability have been valuable assets that have allowed us to endure the extended freight recession. We continue to carefully manage our balance sheet and recognize the opportunities that it presents for our company. We previously disclosed actions we took to secure our letters of credit and to enter into an accounts receivable securitization program. These actions, combined with our existing cash and short-term investments, provide our company with a level of flexibility and liquidity that is necessary to address both the opportunities and challenges of an ever-changing environment.”